feat(plane): analyst comment asks for Approved status + links docs

The analyst ready-comment used the obsolete :approved: wording (comment-based approve was removed in PR #12). Rewrite it for the status-only model: ask the stakeholder to move the issue to Approved (reject = reason comment + Rejected), and add clickable Gitea links to the analyst docs that actually exist in the worktree.
This commit is contained in:
dev-agent
2026-06-03 22:42:53 +03:00
parent 96c5e6b2f9
commit a9cdb17614
2 changed files with 102 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -257,6 +257,58 @@ def advance_stage(
return result
def _build_analyst_ready_comment(repo: str, work_item_id: str, branch: str) -> str:
"""BUG C: HTML comment posted when analyst artifacts are ready.
Status-only model (PR #12): approval is the **Approved** status, NOT a
``:approved:`` comment and NOT moving back to In Progress. The comment asks
the stakeholder to flip the status and links the documents the analyst
actually produced.
Links point at the Gitea web view:
{gitea_url}/{owner}/{repo}/src/branch/{branch}/docs/work-items/{wid}/<file>
Only files that REALLY exist in the worktree are listed (no invented docs).
"""
text = (
"\u2705 BRD/\u0422\u0417/AC \u0433\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b. "
"\u0414\u043b\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0432\u0438\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f "
"\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u0447\u0443 "
"\u0432 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0443\u0441 Approved. "
"\u0414\u043b\u044f \u043e\u0442\u043a\u043b\u043e\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u2014 "
"\u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u0443 "
"\u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u0438 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 "
"\u0432 Rejected."
)
# Candidate analyst artifacts (label -> filename). Only existing ones linked.
candidates = [
("Business request", "00-business-request.md"),
("BRD", "01-brd.md"),
("\u0422\u0417 (TRZ)", "02-trz.md"),
("Acceptance Criteria", "03-acceptance-criteria.md"),
("Test Plan", "04-test-plan.yaml"),
("UI Test Cases", "04b-ui-test-cases.md"),
]
rel_dir = f"docs/work-items/{work_item_id}"
try:
wt_dir = os.path.join(get_worktree_path(repo, branch), rel_dir)
except Exception:
wt_dir = None
owner = getattr(settings, "gitea_owner", "admin")
base = settings.gitea_url.rstrip("/")
links = []
for label, fname in candidates:
if wt_dir and not os.path.isfile(os.path.join(wt_dir, fname)):
continue
href = f"{base}/{owner}/{repo}/src/branch/{branch}/{rel_dir}/{fname}"
links.append(f'<li><a href="{href}">{label}</a></li>')
if links:
text += "<br><b>\u0414\u043e\u043a\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u044b:</b><ul>" + "".join(links) + "</ul>"
return text
def _handle_analysis_approved_flow(
task_id, current_stage, repo, work_item_id, branch, agent, result: AdvanceResult
):
@@ -279,19 +331,17 @@ def _handle_analysis_approved_flow(
files_ok, _ = files_check(repo, work_item_id, branch)
if files_ok:
# Full artifacts ready -> In Review, ask for :approved:.
# Full artifacts ready -> In Review, ask for the Approved STATUS (BUG C).
set_issue_in_review(work_item_id)
plane_add_comment(
work_item_id,
"\U0001f4cb BRD/\u0422\u0417/AC/TestPlan \u0433\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b. "
"\u041f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0443 review \u0438 \u0440\u0435\u0430\u043a\u0446\u0438\u044e :approved: "
"\u0434\u043b\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0432\u0438\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0432 Architecture.",
_build_analyst_ready_comment(repo, work_item_id, branch),
author="analyst",
)
notify_approve_requested(task_id)
result.note = "analysis-in-review"
logger.info(
f"Task {task_id}: analyst finished, requested :approved: in Plane"
f"Task {task_id}: analyst finished, requested Approved status in Plane"
)
return