feat(plane): analyst comment asks for Approved status + links docs

The analyst ready-comment used the obsolete :approved: wording (comment-based approve was removed in PR #12). Rewrite it for the status-only model: ask the stakeholder to move the issue to Approved (reject = reason comment + Rejected), and add clickable Gitea links to the analyst docs that actually exist in the worktree.
This commit is contained in:
dev-agent
2026-06-03 22:42:53 +03:00
parent 96c5e6b2f9
commit a9cdb17614
2 changed files with 102 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -257,6 +257,58 @@ def advance_stage(
return result
def _build_analyst_ready_comment(repo: str, work_item_id: str, branch: str) -> str:
"""BUG C: HTML comment posted when analyst artifacts are ready.
Status-only model (PR #12): approval is the **Approved** status, NOT a
``:approved:`` comment and NOT moving back to In Progress. The comment asks
the stakeholder to flip the status and links the documents the analyst
actually produced.
Links point at the Gitea web view:
{gitea_url}/{owner}/{repo}/src/branch/{branch}/docs/work-items/{wid}/<file>
Only files that REALLY exist in the worktree are listed (no invented docs).
"""
text = (
"\u2705 BRD/\u0422\u0417/AC \u0433\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b. "
"\u0414\u043b\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0432\u0438\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f "
"\u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u0447\u0443 "
"\u0432 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0443\u0441 Approved. "
"\u0414\u043b\u044f \u043e\u0442\u043a\u043b\u043e\u043d\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u2014 "
"\u043d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0448\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043f\u0440\u0438\u0447\u0438\u043d\u0443 "
"\u043a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u043e\u043c \u0438 \u043f\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0432\u0435\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 "
"\u0432 Rejected."
)
# Candidate analyst artifacts (label -> filename). Only existing ones linked.
candidates = [
("Business request", "00-business-request.md"),
("BRD", "01-brd.md"),
("\u0422\u0417 (TRZ)", "02-trz.md"),
("Acceptance Criteria", "03-acceptance-criteria.md"),
("Test Plan", "04-test-plan.yaml"),
("UI Test Cases", "04b-ui-test-cases.md"),
]
rel_dir = f"docs/work-items/{work_item_id}"
try:
wt_dir = os.path.join(get_worktree_path(repo, branch), rel_dir)
except Exception:
wt_dir = None
owner = getattr(settings, "gitea_owner", "admin")
base = settings.gitea_url.rstrip("/")
links = []
for label, fname in candidates:
if wt_dir and not os.path.isfile(os.path.join(wt_dir, fname)):
continue
href = f"{base}/{owner}/{repo}/src/branch/{branch}/{rel_dir}/{fname}"
links.append(f'<li><a href="{href}">{label}</a></li>')
if links:
text += "<br><b>\u0414\u043e\u043a\u0443\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u044b:</b><ul>" + "".join(links) + "</ul>"
return text
def _handle_analysis_approved_flow(
task_id, current_stage, repo, work_item_id, branch, agent, result: AdvanceResult
):
@@ -279,19 +331,17 @@ def _handle_analysis_approved_flow(
files_ok, _ = files_check(repo, work_item_id, branch)
if files_ok:
# Full artifacts ready -> In Review, ask for :approved:.
# Full artifacts ready -> In Review, ask for the Approved STATUS (BUG C).
set_issue_in_review(work_item_id)
plane_add_comment(
work_item_id,
"\U0001f4cb BRD/\u0422\u0417/AC/TestPlan \u0433\u043e\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b. "
"\u041f\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0443 review \u0438 \u0440\u0435\u0430\u043a\u0446\u0438\u044e :approved: "
"\u0434\u043b\u044f \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0432\u0438\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f \u0432 Architecture.",
_build_analyst_ready_comment(repo, work_item_id, branch),
author="analyst",
)
notify_approve_requested(task_id)
result.note = "analysis-in-review"
logger.info(
f"Task {task_id}: analyst finished, requested :approved: in Plane"
f"Task {task_id}: analyst finished, requested Approved status in Plane"
)
return

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
"""BUG C: analyst "artifacts ready" comment under the status-only model.
The comment must ask for the **Approved** status (not the obsolete
":approved:" reaction, not moving back to "In Progress") and link only the
docs that actually exist in the worktree.
"""
import os
import tempfile
os.environ.setdefault("ORCH_GITEA_TOKEN", "test-token")
os.environ.setdefault("ORCH_PLANE_API_TOKEN", "test-token")
def test_analyst_comment_asks_approved_with_links(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
from src import stage_engine as SE
# Worktree with only SOME of the candidate docs present.
wt = tmp_path / "wt"
docs = wt / "docs" / "work-items" / "ET-011"
docs.mkdir(parents=True)
for fname in ("00-business-request.md", "01-brd.md", "02-trz.md",
"03-acceptance-criteria.md", "04-test-plan.yaml"):
(docs / fname).write_text("x")
# 04b-ui-test-cases.md intentionally absent -> must NOT be linked
monkeypatch.setattr(SE, "get_worktree_path", lambda repo, branch: str(wt))
monkeypatch.setattr(SE.settings, "gitea_url", "https://git.mva154.duckdns.org")
monkeypatch.setattr(SE.settings, "gitea_owner", "admin")
html = SE._build_analyst_ready_comment(
"enduro-trails", "ET-011", "feature/ET-011-gpx-upload-feature"
)
# text asks for the Approved STATUS, not the obsolete mechanisms
assert "Approved" in html
assert ":approved:" not in html
assert "In Progress" not in html
assert "Rejected" in html
# clickable links to docs that ACTUALLY exist
assert "<a href=" in html
base = ("https://git.mva154.duckdns.org/admin/enduro-trails/src/branch/"
"feature/ET-011-gpx-upload-feature/docs/work-items/ET-011/")
assert base + "01-brd.md" in html
assert base + "04-test-plan.yaml" in html
# the missing file is NOT invented
assert "04b-ui-test-cases.md" not in html